72° F
|
|

Calif. Senate Rejects Sale Of LA Coliseum, Sports Arena
Steve Lawrence,
May 18, 2008
The state Senate rejected legislation Thursday
that would require the state to sell the site of the historic Los
Angeles Memorial Coliseum and adjoining Los Angeles Sports Arena.
The bill's author, Sen. Jeff Denham, R-Merced, said the stadium
is "falling apart" and that selling the land would generate as
much as $400 million to help ease the state's budget crunch.
California is facing a $15.2 billion deficit in the fiscal year
that starts July 1.
"All I'm asking right now is that we take a look at this
property as well as many other properties in the state and evaluate
whether they're surplus and whether they bring in good tax
revenue," Denham said.
The state owns the land on which the 85-year-old coliseum and
48-year-old arena sit, said Pat Lynch, general manager of the Los
Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission, which manages the two
facilities under a 49-year lease with the state.
Denham's office said the state also owns a third of both
structures, with Los Angeles County and the city of Los Angeles
owning the rest. Lynch, however, said the state owns only the land.
Opponents said the bill would undercut efforts to improve
Exposition Park, which is owned by the state and houses the Natural
History Museum of Los Angeles County, the California Science Center
and the California African American Museum, in addition to the
coliseum and sports arena.
"This measure doesn't do service to the overall objectives we
seek to happen in Exposition Park," said Sen. Mark Ridley-Thomas,
a Los Angeles Democrat who represents the area.
"The Science Center, the California African American Museum are
all state-owned assets the state benefits from. Sale of this
particular property doesn't fit the master plan for that park."
Ridley-Thomas also said selling the property would not help
bring an NFL franchise back to the coliseum, the former home of the
Raiders, now in Oakland, and Rams, now in St. Louis.
"That ship has sailed," Ridley-Thomas said.
Another opponent, Sen. Gil Cedillo, D-Los Angeles, questioned
whether a sale was even legally possible "given the historic
nature of the coliseum."
The coliseum was designated a national historic landmark in
1984, the day before it the start of the Summer Olympics. It also
was the site of the 1932 games and the home of the Los Angeles
Dodgers from 1958 to 1961.
The neighboring University of Southern California currently uses
the stadium under a 25-year lease that can be renewed for another
22 years.
A Senate analysis of the bill also cast doubt on the sale,
saying a buyer could have trouble assuming control of the coliseum
until the commission's lease expires in 2054.
Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Los Angeles, denied that the coliseum is
underutilized, noting that more than 115,000 people watched a
Dodgers-Boston Red Sox exhibition game there in March.
"A crowd of 100,000 is not uncommon," he said. "This building
by no means is an irrelevant facility. This is by no means an
outdated facility. ... Sure, some upgrades are warranted. But it
should achieve its potential while still in the hands of the
people."
The Senate voted 21-16 against the bill, but agreed to allow
Denham to take a second vote at a later time if he chooses.
Denham also has proposed selling several other properties owned
by the state. Those include San Quentin State Prison, part of the
Cow Palace site in Daly City and a wastewater treatment plant at
Soledad State Prison.
"We know that we have thousands of excess parcels of property
around this state," said Sen. Tom Harman, R-Huntington Beach.
"It's about time we seriously started looking at them ... and get
rid of underutilized and excess properties."
Copyright © 2008, KTLA
|